For a long time, this type of work lived across two roles.

On one side was revenue operations. RevOps focused on systems, data, reporting, and process. Keeping the CRM clean, defining stages, maintaining attribution, and making sure sales and marketing could operate with some level of structure.

On the other side was go-to-market engineering. GTM engineers were closer to execution. Building outbound campaigns, creating lead lists, running enrichment, wiring together tools, and making sure outreach could scale.

Both roles solved real problems.

But as go-to-market motions have become more technical and more interconnected, the line between them has blurred.

What we are seeing now is a convergence of these two skill sets into a new role.

I didn’t coin the term, but the first time I saw this idea clearly articulated was in a post from Benjamin Reed, founder of RevyOps. It put language to something we were already seeing happen in practice.

That role is what we think of as revenue engineering

‍

Revenue engineering is an operating mindset

Revenue engineering is not a single workflow, channel, or system.

It is a way of thinking about how revenue moves through a business and how to design systems that support that motion end to end.

That includes:

• Understanding how demand is generated and qualified
  
  
• Knowing how sales actually prioritizes and closes
  
  
• Accounting for customer fit, retention, and expansion
  
  
• Building feedback loops so teams can see what is working
  
  

The systems come after the understanding, not before.

‍

How this shows up in practice

At QC Growth, this mindset shows up in different ways depending on the client and the stage they are in.

One common pattern is how we approach data and context.

We often start with limited inputs and incomplete information. Instead of treating that as a blocker, we design systems that can progressively add signal, apply logic, and surface what actually matters. The goal is not perfect data. The goal is making better decisions than before.

That usually means:

• Translating loose ICP definitions into explicit filters and scoring
  
  
• Being aggressive about exclusion so teams are not wasting time
  
  
• Making tradeoffs between cost, accuracy, and speed
  
  
• Pushing the resulting intelligence back into shared systems where teams actually work
  
  

None of this is about enrichment for enrichment’s sake. It is about focus.

‍

Revenue engineering is about identifying and operationalizing signals

A big part of revenue engineering is understanding which signals are worth paying attention to.

Finding the right signals requires a deep understanding of the product, the positioning, the market, and what has historically worked. Without that context, it is easy to pull in activity that looks interesting but does not create action.

A revenue engineer needs to do two things well.

First, identify the signals that are most likely to indicate intent or readiness. The signals that, when acted on, actually lead to conversations.

Second, build systems around those signals so they can be used consistently.

That usually means connecting several components together:

• The source of the signal
  
  
• The lead or account list it applies to
  
  
• The scoring or prioritization logic
  
  
• The messaging that explains why the outreach is relevant
  
  
• The channel where that message is delivered
  
  

All of these pieces matter.

A strong signal without the right message falls flat. Good messaging sent to the wrong list wastes time. The wrong channel at the wrong moment kills momentum.

Revenue engineering is about pulling all of that together into a system that can run repeatedly and improve over time.

‍

Revenue systems do not stop at sales

Revenue work does not end once a lead is qualified.

In practice, the systems we build usually touch multiple teams.

• Sales needs clarity on what to prioritize today
  
  
• Customer success needs visibility into long term fit
  
  
• Marketing needs feedback on which inputs actually convert
  
  
• Founders need reporting that reflects reality, not vanity metrics
  
  

That is why most of the systems we design push intelligence back into shared infrastructure like HubSpot/Attio instead of living in isolated dashboards or one off exports.

If insight cannot be acted on, it is not useful.

‍

Revenue engineering shows up outside of data workflows

Not all revenue systems are data pipelines.

We also build systems around things like content and publishing because those inputs shape demand and trust over time.

One example is using internal context from Notion and Slack to help founders generate first drafts for blogs or social posts. The goal is not to replace writing. The goal is to remove friction and make it easier to show up consistently with content that reflects the reality of the business.

That is still revenue work.

It affects how a company is perceived, how clearly it communicates, and how often it stays top of mind. Those inputs compound in the same way outbound systems do.

‍

Revenue engineers need to be builders, not just operators

Another important piece of the role is the ability to build.

Not everything needs to be custom coded, and not everything should be. But a revenue engineer needs to be comfortable using coding tools and automation platforms to design systems that do not exist out of the box.

That includes:

• Using no code and low code tools like n8n or Zapier to orchestrate workflows
  
  
• Writing small amounts of code when logic or flexibility is missing
  
  
• Prototyping internal tools that improve visibility or decision making
  
  
• Connecting systems in ways traditional tools do not support
  
  

“Vibe coding” does not work for everything yet. But when used intentionally, these tools dramatically expand what a small team can build and maintain.

The goal is not to replace engineering teams. The goal is to remove bottlenecks.

Revenue engineers sit close enough to the problem to know what needs to exist, and close enough to the tools to actually build it. That might be a lightweight internal dashboard, a custom scoring service, a routing layer, or a workflow that gives sales and customer success better visibility without waiting on a roadmap.

This is especially important for revenue driven work.

When signals, scoring, messaging, and reporting all live in different systems, small gaps add up quickly. Being able to build or extend systems closes those gaps and keeps momentum moving.

‍

Full scale revenue ownership

This is where the idea of the revenue engineer fully comes together.

A revenue engineer does not own a single channel or tool. They own the system.

That means being accountable for:

• Where signals come from
  
  
• How leads and accounts are prioritized
  
  
• Why certain messages get sent
  
  
• Which channels are used and when
  
  
• How results feed back into the system
  
  
• How tooling and automation support all of the above
  
  

It requires comfort moving between strategy and execution, between commercial conversations and technical decisions.

That combination is what makes the role hard and valuable.

I did not coin the term revenue engineer. But it accurately describes how this role has evolved and what it now demands.

At QC Growth, we do not think about this as a title. We think about it as how the work gets done.

Learn the full motion. Respect the messiness. Build systems that help revenue move with more intention over time.

Nothing is ever finished. The systems just get sharper.

‍